Wipeout · Not in the Ranked rotation

Best Brawlers for WALKING ON HOT SAND

Which brawler should you pick on WALKING ON HOT SAND? These are the win rates BrawlPick observed for 96 brawlers on this Wipeout map, from 1,972 battles. The most reliable picks are Vince (76% of 200 games), Gus (67.2% of 585 games) and Amber (67.8% of 230 games).

Statistics as of today

Includes Ranked and regular 3v3 battles, not Ranked only. The rotation status is the last one detected from Ranked battles, separate from these statistics.

Playing WALKING ON HOT SAND? Open it in BrawlPick

Opens the picker with Wipeout and WALKING ON HOT SAND selected. Free, no sign-up needed.

Strongest observed brawlers on WALKING ON HOT SAND

Ordered by the low end of each brawler's 95% range, not by raw win rate, so a high number from a small sample doesn't simply jump to the top. The range shows how far the true win rate could plausibly be from the observed one. The reliable picks named above — the same as on this map's card — have 150+ games and a range entirely above 50%.

Top 10 brawlers on WALKING ON HOT SAND by the low end of their 95% range
#BrawlerWin rate95% rangeGames
176%70–81%200
267.2%63–71%585
367.8%62–74%230
469.6%61–77%112 (limited sample)
567.1%59–74%140 (limited sample)
673.7%58–85%38 (limited sample)
774.3%58–86%35 (limited sample)
863.1%57–69%241
964.2%57–71%165
1062.8%56–69%199

* Fewer than 150 games: a limited sample, so the range is wide.

WALKING ON HOT SAND tier list from win rates

A data-based tier list from the same games as the tables on this page, not an official or community list. Each tier compares one brawler's 95% range on WALKING ON HOT SAND with a 50% win rate; B does not mean average, only that the range still includes 50%. A tier needs 150+ games on this map.

Tier S: Clearly well above 50%

whole 95% range at least 5 points above 50% · 6 brawlers

Tier A: Clearly above 50%

whole range above 50% · 2 brawlers

Tier B: Inconclusive

range includes 50%: could be above or below, not shown to be average · 11 brawlers

Tier C: Clearly below 50%

whole range below 50% · 4 brawlers

Tier D: Clearly well below 50%

whole range at least 5 points below 50% · 2 brawlers

Not rated: 12 more brawlers have fewer than 30 games on WALKING ON HOT SAND (or none) in this data. That says nothing about how strong they are.

What the data says about WALKING ON HOT SAND

  • Marksman brawlers are over-represented at the top: 3 of the 10 strongest, against about 1.1 you would expect from their share of the full table.

Classes are the official in-game classes. These are descriptions of the observed games, not causes.

Promising, but not enough games yet

These brawlers won often on WALKING ON HOT SAND but appear in fewer than 150 observed games, so their win rate is much less certain.

Promising brawlers on WALKING ON HOT SAND with limited samples
BrawlerWin rate95% rangeGames
67.1%56–77%73 (limited sample)
66.7%53–78%54 (limited sample)
63.4%52–74%71 (limited sample)
63.4%48–76%41 (limited sample)
63.4%48–76%41 (limited sample)

Most played on WALKING ON HOT SAND

Brawlers that appeared in the most observed games. Popular is not the same as strong — compare the win rates.

Most played brawlers on WALKING ON HOT SAND
BrawlerWin rate95% rangeGames
67.2%63–71%585
34.6%31–39%515
55.2%51–60%458
41.8%37–47%407
46.7%42–52%368

Lowest observed win rates

Brawlers whose win rate on WALKING ON HOT SAND was clearly below 50% in this sample, even allowing for its size. This can reflect the map, the drafts they were picked into, or who played them — not necessarily that the brawler can't work here.

Lowest observed win rates on WALKING ON HOT SAND
BrawlerWin rate95% rangeGames
22.8%14–35%57 (limited sample)
34.6%31–39%515
32.3%26–40%161
31.3%22–42%83 (limited sample)
29.1%19–42%55 (limited sample)
All 96 brawlers on WALKING ON HOT SAND
All rated brawlers on WALKING ON HOT SAND
#BrawlerWin rate95% rangeGames
176%70–81%200
267.2%63–71%585
367.8%62–74%230
469.6%61–77%112 (limited sample)
567.1%59–74%140 (limited sample)
673.7%58–85%38 (limited sample)
774.3%58–86%35 (limited sample)
863.1%57–69%241
964.2%57–71%165
1062.8%56–69%199
1167.1%56–77%73 (limited sample)
1262.6%54–70%139 (limited sample)
1362.8%54–71%113 (limited sample)
1466.7%53–78%54 (limited sample)
1563.4%52–74%71 (limited sample)
1657%51–62%302
1755.2%51–60%458
1859.3%50–68%113 (limited sample)
1958.8%49–68%97 (limited sample)
2063%49–75%46 (limited sample)
2163.4%48–76%41 (limited sample)
2263.4%48–76%41 (limited sample)
2354.5%47–61%189
2454.8%47–63%146 (limited sample)
2554.4%46–62%138 (limited sample)
2661%46–74%41 (limited sample)
2760%45–73%45 (limited sample)
2854.4%45–63%114 (limited sample)
2957.4%45–69%61 (limited sample)
3049.7%45–55%358
3153.6%44–63%110 (limited sample)
3252.9%44–62%119 (limited sample)
3359%43–73%39 (limited sample)
3458.5%43–72%41 (limited sample)
3549.7%43–57%185
3646.7%42–52%368
3754.6%42–67%55 (limited sample)
3849.7%42–58%141 (limited sample)
3947.6%41–54%233
4050.5%41–60%103 (limited sample)
4153.2%41–65%62 (limited sample)
4257.1%41–72%35 (limited sample)
4347.4%40–55%156
4453.1%39–66%49 (limited sample)
4546.2%39–53%184
4650.8%39–62%67 (limited sample)
4750%39–61%70 (limited sample)
4844.3%38–51%246
4947.6%38–57%103 (limited sample)
5041.8%37–47%407
5146.9%36–58%81 (limited sample)
5242.9%36–50%189
5343%35–51%156
5447%35–59%66 (limited sample)
5550%35–65%38 (limited sample)
5642.2%35–50%154
5741%35–48%212
5844.4%35–55%90 (limited sample)
5947.9%34–62%48 (limited sample)
6041.9%34–50%148 (limited sample)
6139.8%34–46%231
6241.5%34–50%135 (limited sample)
6345.6%33–58%57 (limited sample)
6444.6%33–57%65 (limited sample)
6547.5%33–63%40 (limited sample)
6643.4%33–55%76 (limited sample)
6743.2%33–55%74 (limited sample)
6848.4%32–65%31 (limited sample)
6943.3%32–56%60 (limited sample)
7047.1%31–63%34 (limited sample)
7138.4%31–46%151
7244.4%31–59%45 (limited sample)
7334.6%31–39%515
7446.7%30–64%30 (limited sample)
7543.5%30–58%46 (limited sample)
7639.6%30–50%91 (limited sample)
7745.5%30–62%33 (limited sample)
7838.3%30–48%107 (limited sample)
7937.7%29–47%106 (limited sample)
8039.7%29–52%63 (limited sample)
8137%27–48%81 (limited sample)
8238.5%27–52%52 (limited sample)
8339.1%26–54%46 (limited sample)
8439.1%26–54%46 (limited sample)
8535.7%26–46%84 (limited sample)
8636.2%26–48%69 (limited sample)
8732.3%26–40%161
8840.6%25–58%32 (limited sample)
8933.7%25–44%95 (limited sample)
9034.3%24–46%73 (limited sample)
9138.2%24–55%34 (limited sample)
9231.3%22–42%83 (limited sample)
9333.3%22–47%51 (limited sample)
9429.1%19–42%55 (limited sample)
9528.6%17–44%42 (limited sample)
9622.8%14–35%57 (limited sample)

12 more brawlers were seen on WALKING ON HOT SAND with fewer than 30 games and are not rated.

How to use these numbers

These are observed results, not a prediction. A win rate also reflects who played the brawler and the drafts it was picked into: a brawler that is usually chosen as a counter will look stronger than it would as a blind first pick.

Use the table to shortlist brawlers for WALKING ON HOT SAND, then decide from your draft: what was banned, what your team needs and what the enemy picked. That last step is what the BrawlPick picker does for you — it weighs these numbers together with counters, synergy and role balance, so its recommendation is not simply this table sorted by win rate.

More Wipeout maps and guides

Playing WALKING ON HOT SAND right now?

BrawlPick combines map fit with the live draft — bans, your team, the enemy picks and the brawlers you own — and recommends a brawler with the reasons behind it.

Get a recommendation for this map