Bounty · Not in the Ranked rotation

Best Brawlers for Alchemy

Which brawler should you pick on Alchemy? These are the win rates BrawlPick observed for 94 brawlers on this Bounty map, from 2,461 battles. The most reliable picks are Cosmo (67.2% of 238 games), Vince (65.4% of 381 games) and Pierce (60% of 382 games).

Statistics as of today

Includes Ranked and regular 3v3 battles, not Ranked only. The rotation status is the last one detected from Ranked battles, separate from these statistics. See every Bounty map and the mode-wide ranking.

Playing Alchemy? Open it in BrawlPick

Opens the picker with Bounty and Alchemy selected. Free, no sign-up needed.

Strongest observed brawlers on Alchemy

Ordered by the low end of each brawler's 95% range, not by raw win rate, so a high number from a small sample doesn't simply jump to the top. The range shows how far the true win rate could plausibly be from the observed one. The reliable picks named above — the same as on this map's card — have 150+ games and a range entirely above 50%.

Top 10 brawlers on Alchemy by the low end of their 95% range
#BrawlerWin rate95% rangeGames
167.2%61–73%238
265.4%60–70%381
369.8%59–78%86 (limited sample)
468.8%59–77%96 (limited sample)
560%55–65%382
658.5%54–63%518
766.7%54–78%57 (limited sample)
858.9%53–64%299
960%52–67%160
1059.3%51–67%135 (limited sample)

* Fewer than 150 games: a limited sample, so the range is wide.

Alchemy tier list from win rates

A data-based tier list from the same games as the tables on this page, not an official or community list. Each tier compares one brawler's 95% range on Alchemy with a 50% win rate; B does not mean average, only that the range still includes 50%. A tier needs 150+ games on this map. For the whole mode, see the Bounty tier list.

Tier S: Clearly well above 50%

whole 95% range at least 5 points above 50% · 3 brawlers

Tier A: Clearly above 50%

whole range above 50% · 5 brawlers

Tier B: Inconclusive

range includes 50%: could be above or below, not shown to be average · 15 brawlers

Tier C: Clearly below 50%

whole range below 50% · 3 brawlers

Tier D: Clearly well below 50%

whole range at least 5 points below 50% · 1 brawler

Not rated: 14 more brawlers have fewer than 30 games on Alchemy (or none) in this data. That says nothing about how strong they are.

What the data says about Alchemy

  • Marksman brawlers are over-represented at the top: 4 of the 10 strongest, against about 1.2 you would expect from their share of the full table.
  • Popular is not the same as strong, so compare the numbers: the most played brawler here, Piper (1,873 games), ranks #12 of 94 by reliability.

Classes are the official in-game classes. These are descriptions of the observed games, not causes.

Promising, but not enough games yet

These brawlers won often on Alchemy but appear in fewer than 150 observed games, so their win rate is much less certain.

Promising brawlers on Alchemy with limited samples
BrawlerWin rate95% rangeGames
60%48–71%70 (limited sample)
59.5%44–74%37 (limited sample)
59.4%42–75%32 (limited sample)
58.9%47–69%73 (limited sample)
58.8%47–70%68 (limited sample)

Most played on Alchemy

Brawlers that appeared in the most observed games. Popular is not the same as strong — compare the win rates.

Most played brawlers on Alchemy
BrawlerWin rate95% rangeGames
52.5%50–55%1,873
49.2%46–53%718
50.4%46–54%569
46.3%42–50%555
58.5%54–63%518

Lowest observed win rates

Brawlers whose win rate on Alchemy was clearly below 50% in this sample, even allowing for its size. This can reflect the map, the drafts they were picked into, or who played them — not necessarily that the brawler can't work here.

Lowest observed win rates on Alchemy
BrawlerWin rate95% rangeGames
18.9%9–34%37 (limited sample)
23.3%14–35%60 (limited sample)
23.6%14–36%55 (limited sample)
27.3%19–37%88 (limited sample)
35.7%31–41%387
All 94 brawlers on Alchemy
All rated brawlers on Alchemy
#BrawlerWin rate95% rangeGames
167.2%61–73%238
265.4%60–70%381
369.8%59–78%86 (limited sample)
468.8%59–77%96 (limited sample)
560%55–65%382
658.5%54–63%518
766.7%54–78%57 (limited sample)
858.9%53–64%299
960%52–67%160
1059.3%51–67%135 (limited sample)
1155.4%51–60%430
1252.5%50–55%1,873
1355%50–60%340
1455%50–60%322
1557.3%49–65%131 (limited sample)
1657.3%49–65%131 (limited sample)
1760%48–71%70 (limited sample)
1855.4%48–63%175
1952.8%48–58%343
2058.9%47–69%73 (limited sample)
2158.8%47–70%68 (limited sample)
2250.4%46–54%569
2355.5%46–64%110 (limited sample)
2449.2%46–53%718
2558.2%45–70%55 (limited sample)
2658.2%45–70%55 (limited sample)
2756.7%45–68%67 (limited sample)
2855.7%45–66%79 (limited sample)
2950.8%44–58%191
3059.5%44–74%37 (limited sample)
3151%43–59%145 (limited sample)
3251.2%43–60%129 (limited sample)
3359.4%42–75%32 (limited sample)
3446.3%42–50%555
3549%42–56%192
3648.4%41–55%192
3752.8%41–64%72 (limited sample)
3848%41–55%196
3957.6%41–73%33 (limited sample)
4051.5%40–63%66 (limited sample)
4146.1%39–53%193
4250.8%39–63%65 (limited sample)
4350%38–62%60 (limited sample)
4442.9%37–49%233
4552.9%37–69%34 (limited sample)
4643.8%37–51%176
4744.1%36–52%152
4851.3%36–66%39 (limited sample)
4948.3%36–61%60 (limited sample)
5046.1%36–56%89 (limited sample)
5145.1%36–55%102 (limited sample)
5247.6%36–60%63 (limited sample)
5343.8%36–52%128 (limited sample)
5448.2%35–61%54 (limited sample)
5544.8%35–55%96 (limited sample)
5642.7%35–51%150
5742%35–50%169
5850%34–66%36 (limited sample)
5947.2%34–60%53 (limited sample)
6045.5%34–57%66 (limited sample)
6143.3%34–53%97 (limited sample)
6239.1%33–45%271
6346.8%33–61%47 (limited sample)
6442.1%33–52%95 (limited sample)
6540.8%33–50%125 (limited sample)
6644.1%32–57%59 (limited sample)
6742.7%32–54%75 (limited sample)
6848.4%32–65%31 (limited sample)
6940.2%31–50%107 (limited sample)
7035.7%31–41%387
7140%30–51%80 (limited sample)
7239.7%30–51%78 (limited sample)
7341%30–54%61 (limited sample)
7439.2%29–50%79 (limited sample)
7540.7%29–54%54 (limited sample)
7638.6%28–50%70 (limited sample)
7736.8%27–47%87 (limited sample)
7842.4%27–59%33 (limited sample)
7939.2%27–53%51 (limited sample)
8041.2%26–58%34 (limited sample)
8134.8%26–45%92 (limited sample)
8238.1%25–53%42 (limited sample)
8334.7%23–49%49 (limited sample)
8431.3%22–42%83 (limited sample)
8536.4%22–53%33 (limited sample)
8635%22–50%40 (limited sample)
8732.7%21–47%49 (limited sample)
8831.7%20–47%41 (limited sample)
8930%19–44%50 (limited sample)
9027.3%19–37%88 (limited sample)
9127.8%16–44%36 (limited sample)
9223.3%14–35%60 (limited sample)
9323.6%14–36%55 (limited sample)
9418.9%9–34%37 (limited sample)

14 more brawlers were seen on Alchemy with fewer than 30 games and are not rated.

How to use these numbers

These are observed results, not a prediction. A win rate also reflects who played the brawler and the drafts it was picked into: a brawler that is usually chosen as a counter will look stronger than it would as a blind first pick.

Use the table to shortlist brawlers for Alchemy, then decide from your draft: what was banned, what your team needs and what the enemy picked. That last step is what the BrawlPick picker does for you — it weighs these numbers together with counters, synergy and role balance, so its recommendation is not simply this table sorted by win rate.

For the roles a Bounty team usually needs, see the Bounty strategy on the mode page.

More Bounty maps and guides

Playing Alchemy right now?

BrawlPick combines map fit with the live draft — bans, your team, the enemy picks and the brawlers you own — and recommends a brawler with the reasons behind it.

Get a recommendation for this map